Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Three Aspects of Hamlet



The Senior English teacher at a local high school invited me to lecture on Hamlet. I am no expert, and I have no credentials in the area other than my admiration for the play and the time and thought applied to it. The notes for that lecture follow.

Please note that the references to lines of the play will vary according to the edition you use.

Three Aspects of Hamlet
Read more!

[Lecture, Nov. 9, 2006]

Introduction:

We will examine the concept of self, integrity and duplicity, and Shakespeare's use of language in the play. Notice Hamlet's remark in I.ii.76, "Seems madam! nay it is: I know not 'seems.' " We will use this passage to illustrate these three aspects of the play.

I. The Concept of Self in Hamlet

The play contains many dramatic elements, such as murder, treachery, incest, royal succession, etc., but is the play really about any of these? Prince Hamlet himself is the heart of the play. Who is he? What will he become? Norrie Epstein [The Friendly Shakespeare] claims that this is " a play about writing a play" (p. 328). That is, it allows us to watch Hamlet the prince write out the course of his own life.

When Hamlet considers himself, what is this "self" that he is? The first line of the play is a tense, "Who's there?" We will be asking and answering that question for the rest of the play.

A. Hamlet's concept of self is dominated by the mind, the inner man.
1. Notice Hamlet's contrast between outward "seeming" and inward reality in I.ii.76-86, where he contrasts his outer clothes and actions with "that within which passeth show."
2. Also, in II.ii.255-257 and 260-261, Hamlet comments to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern that the inner attitude shapes one's experience or evaluation of the outside world. While all of us experience this to some degree, Hamlet's wording is very strong.

B. Hamlet seeks truth and honesty in his relations with other selves. See II.ii.174-179, where Hamlet wishes that Polonius were at least as honest as a fishmonger.

C. Yet the self is essentially cut off from others.
1. Hamlet's distrust of those around him has led him to claim [II.ii.316-324] that "man delights not me." Two factors undermine the reliability of this claim: (1) He may not trust Ros. and Guil. enough to be completely honest with them; and (2) he may not be accurately assessing himself here. He is, after all, somewhat confused.
2. Still, as the play progresses, Hamlet cuts himself off from almost everyone except Horatio in his search for truth and his own role, and Horation is not the help that Hamlet needs.

D. The self, thus cut off, tends toward despair.
1. Hamlet is already melancholy and depressed at the beginning of the play because of the unseemly haste with which his mother has remarried after the death of Hamlet, Sr., and because of her astonishing (incestuous?) choice of Hamlet's uncle Claudius as her second husband. See, for example, I.II.129 ff.
2. Through the second act, and with no one to trust, Hamlet's depression deepens amid the court intrigue. See II.ii.219-221.

E. A New Kind of Hero?
1. Norrie Epstein comments (pp. 328 ff.), 'Hamlet is a play about writing a play, Hamlet's inner drama, in which he struggles to become a new kind of hero. ... [He] is torn between the furious medieval avenger, who "out-Herods Herod," and the thougtful modern hero, who doesn't go around killing stepfathers upon the advice of a ghost, who may or may not be trusted.'
2. We see the tension in his struggle clearly in II.ii.575-634. Hamlet is paralyzed for the moment, although the following scenes show him in a flurry of activity. He wants to do right, but he doesn't know what that is.

II. Integrity and Duplicity in Hamlet

A. Again, in I.ii.76-86, Hamlet portrays himself as honest, “I know not ‘seems.’” He dismisses “actions that a man might play” as insignificant compared to “that within which passeth show,” but it is not long before “play” instead of honesty characterizes Hamlet’s actions.

B. A play is a “seeming,” and Hamlet uses a play-within-a-play as a tool to arrive at truth. The actors who arrive at the castle will put on an old play that they know well, The Murder of Gonzago, and Hamlet will add some lines to make it fit recent events in Denmark. He hopes that the King’s outward reaction will display guilt or innocence of Hamlet, Sr.’s, murder.

C. Hamlet’s own life becomes another play-within-a-play. He wants to be the “new kind of hero” described above, acting on truth, but he uses duplicity to arrive there. He also fakes insanity, but sporadically. Which actions are from his sanity, which from his faked insanity? Is the faked insanity becoming the real thing? It’s hard to tell.

D. Almost everyone else in the play is playing a “seeming” part. Ophelia and Horatio are probably exceptions. Polonius advises Reynaldo on how to use deception to spy on Laertes.
Is Gertrude deceiving or self-deceived? That is, was she part of the plot, or is she just trying to insure her survival and Hamlet’s by ignoring inconvenient realities? Claudius is in a completely dishonest position, having stolen his brother’s life, throne, and wife. He sends Hamlet to England under the guise of diplomacy, but with the intent of having him killed there. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern – how honest are they?

III. Shakespeare’s Use of Language
Shakespeare skill with language shows up in several different ways.

A. In I.ii.68-75, Hamlet’s mother, Gertrude, advises him to stop mourning for his father. The time for mourning is over, and death is common. Why does this death “seem so particular with” Hamlet? Like many other adolescents, Hamlet focuses on the otherwise negligible word, “seems,” and makes a major fuss over this minor word, thus diverting the conversation from “why do you wear black” to the hurt he has inside.

But look at this conversation from Shakespeare’s point of view instead of Hamlet and Gertrude’s. It is as if Shakespeare were a master woodworker making an elaborate and ornate chest of drawers from fine wood, with ornate carving and complex design. He picks up an inconsequential splinter from the floor, and from that splinter he carves a perfect, complete miniature of the whole chest of drawers. This is what he has done with language. He has picked up an otherwise inconsequential word from Gertrude’s motherly question, and he turns it into a miniature version of the whole play. What is the difference between what “seems” in the play, and what is real? The prince spends the remainder of the play trying to find an answer to that question.

B. Building an image of words, then blasting it. In II.ii.316-324 Hamlet gives a beautifully worded description of what it means to be human, then says that he just isn’t interested in it.

C. Sudden, odd pictures. In II.ii.397 Hamlet describes his occasional insanity by saying, “I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw.” His madness is as changeable as the wind, but why bring up the hawk and the handsaw, besides the alliteration?

D. In II.ii.471, ff., the extended description of the fall of Troy plays on words that could have two different meanings (e.g., “arms” as part of your body or as weapons) and combines them. He combines the idea of a warrior and his coat of arms by saying that Pyrrhus becomes coated in his own heraldry, changing from “sable” (i.e., black from the ash of burning Troy) to “gules” (i.e., red from the blood of his victims). The clarity of the picture, the overlay of different senses of language, and the choice of power words give Shakespeare’s language its power.

E. Comparison of Shakespeare to a distillery. The result is more potent and more pure. Shakespeare makes every word bear its own weight and support the intent of the whole composition.

F. Pages 228 ff. in The Friendly Shakespeare give examples of phrases that were first written by Shakespeare that have passed into everyday speech in English.
i. Brevity is the soul of wit.
ii. Neither rhyme nor reason.
iii. The primrose path
iv. Eaten me out of house and home
v. Till the crack of doom
vi. Dead as a doornail
vii. An eye-sore
viii. Wear my heart on my sleeve
ix. Budge an inch
x. Knock, knock! Who’s there.

Monday, December 25, 2006

A Christmas Meditation on John 15

Jesus not only became one of us - he has also united himself to his people so that his life and nature become ours. He gives himself to us as our abiding place, and there we give ourselves to him and to each other, in love. We have our being and our iedentity in him. He gives us life and causes us to bear fruit. Our abiding is thus at once active and restful.

In him we also are targets of trouble. The Incarnation plunged Jesus into our troubles, and now we share his. The world hates and resists him, and therefore us. And all of this is at times painful and troublesome. But it is all in the hands of a loving Father, our vine-dresser, who only allows such adversity as will cause us to bear more fruit.

Look around you. The people around you also are targets of trouble. Some are in great pain, even if they do not show it. Love them. Be gentle and thoughtful. Listen very carefully with your ears and heart. Let them see their Savior's love in you.

Here we see Christ, who for us and for our salvation became flesh, that we might be joined everlastingly to him, our Vine. Thus we partake of his nature, which is love, and bear its fruit, which is also love. Thus we are greatly beloved of God - Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

Amen.

Friday, September 01, 2006

Trollope Still Speaks!

Anthony Trollope's novel The Warden gives the following description of a fictitious 19th century English newspaper called the Jupiter, describing its headquarters as "Mount Olympus" :

Who has not heard of Mount Olympus—that high abode of all the powers of type, that favoured seat of the great goddess Pica, that wondrous habitation of gods and devils, from whence, with ceaseless hum of steam and never-ending flow of Castalian ink, issue forth fifty thousand nightly edicts for the governance of a subject nation?

Velvet and gilding do not make a throne, nor gold and jewels a sceptre. It is a throne because the most exalted one sits there—and a sceptre because the most mighty one wields it. So it is with Mount Olympus. Should a stranger make his way thither at dull noonday, or during the sleepy hours of the silent afternoon, he would find no acknowledged temple of power and beauty, no fitting fane for the great Thunderer, no proud façades and pillared roofs to support the dignity of this greatest of earthly potentates. To the outward and uninitiated eye, Mount Olympus is a somewhat humble spot—undistinguished, unadorned,—nay, almost mean. It stands alone, as it were, in a mighty city, close to the densest throng of men, but partaking neither of the noise nor the crowd; a small secluded, dreary spot, tenanted, one would say, by quiet unambitious people at the easiest rents. “Is this Mount Olympus?” asks the unbelieving stranger. “Is it from these small, dark, dingy buildings that those infallible laws proceed which cabinets are called upon to obey; by which bishops are to be guided, lords and commons controlled,—judges instructed in law, generals in strategy, admirals in naval tactics, and orange-women in the management of their barrows?” “Yes, my friend—from these walls. From here issue the only known infallible bulls for the guidance of British souls and bodies. This little court is the Vatican of England. Here reigns a pope, self-nominated, self-consecrated—ay, and much stranger too—self-believing!—a pope whom, if you cannot obey him, I would advise you to disobey as silently as possible; a pope hitherto afraid of no Luther; a pope who manages his own inquisition, who punishes unbelievers as no most skilful inquisitor of Spain ever dreamt of doing—one who can excommunicate thoroughly, fearfully, radically; put you beyond the pale of men’s charity; make you odious to your dearest friends, and turn you into a monster to be pointed at by the finger!”

Sound familiar? See the full text of the chapter here. Trollope extends his mock-awe of the Jupiter for several paragraphs.

Thursday, August 17, 2006

Book Reviews: "Derrida" and "Leven Thumps"

If one must be awake at this time of night, then a hot drink without caffeine offers both the comfort of sipping and the possibility of slumber to follow. In this case, the beverage is Celestial Seasonings' "Mandarin Orange" - not that you are really interested in my liquid intake, but here it is for the record. Help yourself, the water is still hot.

Introducing Derrida (Collins and Mayblin, Totem Books, 1996) looked like a comprehensible introduction to this philosopher (or anti-philosopher, take your pick), so I picked it up used for $4. It's part of a series by Totem Books, heavily illustrated, and not quite 200 pages. If you can imagine a comic book that focuses on philosophic disputes, you have a pretty good idea of the approach this book takes. Other topics in the Introducing series include Kant, Wagner, Quantum Theory, and Astrology.

Derrida is associated with the development of post-modernism and especially "deconstruction" in literary criticism and philosophy. The biggest idea behind all of it seemed to be that writing can always be misunderstood, be it ever so carefully couched in clear diction and specific context. Surely that is a grotesque oversimplification that would make Derrida cringe, but that was the impression it made on me. But then, it was only writing, and I may have misunderstood it.

Leven Thumps and the Gateway to Foo (Obert Skye, Simon & Schuster, 2005) was much lighter, but it had better pictures and a faster story line. Skye probably won't make the impression on modern literature and criticism that Derrida has, but he's more accessible. It's not a great book. Although the author occasionally uses some very funny wit ("And the flags that only days before had hung majestically on the top of local flagpoles no longer looked majestic, they looked like multicolored pieces of cloth that had climbed up and tragically hung themselves."), even there the wording could be tighter. The disasters are a bit overdone, the bad guys are often two-dimensional, and I'm not sure if the repeated expressions of confidence in "fate" to provide what the good guys need are merely vacuous or intended to be funny. I gave the author the benefit of the doubt and took it for humor. I still didn't see quite enough development of the central characters to make them deeply likeable, but they're nice enough kids and they have potential.

T&T

Saturday, August 12, 2006

Product Review

Put down the glass of whatever you're drinking, unless you want it spewing out your nose, when you read this review of Tuscan Milk.

H/T Sharp As A Marble

T&T

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

Religious Irony

A friend of mine who pastors a church suggested the following as a gift to first-time visitors:


This illustrates the irony in which his mind usually lurks. Yes, he affirms that God created the world (and specifically that creation is in Christ, through him, and for him), but the current debate between creationists and evolutionists can use a bit of humor and self-deprecation.

Thursday, August 03, 2006

Movie review: "Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels"

"English Breakfast" may sound inappropriate for late evening, but I opened a fresh tin of loose tea this morning, so I'm celebrating it. You can have some toast with cream cheese and fresh tomato slices with it.

The bathroom walls still need a bit of patching. The first application of joint compound has helped smooth some of the rough spots, but there is plenty of work to be done.

I just finished watching "Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels" (1998) (rated R), a crime comedy of errors, written and directed by Guy Ritchie. Good entertainment value, good balance of tension and comedy, very tightly knit. It has a very similar style to "Snatch" (2000), also w&d by GR, and some of the cast is in both movies, notably Jason Statham, Alan Ford, and Vinnie Jones. No Brad Pitt in this one. Both have good entertainment value, balance of tension and comedy, and a story so tightly knit it could be a bullet-proof jumper.

So, does the tea have too much caffeine for this time of night?

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Tire-d

Sorry I'm late. Let me go put the water on.

There, that shouldn't take too long. Today's brew is Celestial Seasonings' (R) "Perfectly Pear" white tea. Yeah, yeah, "If it's white, how can you see it?" Once it's ready, you can tell for yourself.

On my way to the river yesterday, I noticed that a tire on my car was almost flat. It must have been flatter than I thought, because driving it about 6 blocks to a service station to inflate it chewed up the inside of the tire so much that it couldn't be repaired. The new one took about 2 hours to put on and it cost about $ 120.

The paint on my bathroom walls is mostly in the same bad shape that the ceiling paint was. About 70% came off easily, and the other 30% sticks like glue. I think the best approach will be to leave the paint that wants to stick, and use joint compound or spackling to smooth out the edges.

The new shut-off valve to the toilet also has a slow leak at the join to the cast iron intake line. I forgot to brush the rust off the old pipe threads before putting the Teflon tape and new valve on.

Just a minute, the kettle is whistling.

Ahh, that's better. As you can see, the "white" tea has a very pale amber tint. According to "About.com", it's called white because "the leaves are picked and harvested before the leaves open fully, when the buds are still covered by fine white hair." Also, "White tea is similar to green tea, in that it's undergone very little processing and no fermentation. But there is a noticable difference in taste. Most green teas have a distinctive 'grassy' taste to them, but white tea does not. The flavour is described as light, and sweet." The light and sweet flavor go well with the vanilla and pear flavorings that Celestial Seasonings (R) has added to their mixture.

The Triscuits (TM) are gone, so we will have to make do with stale saltines and soft cheese.

T&T

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

Boat Repair and House Repair

Come in, the water has just boiled, and this afternoon's tea is Ceylon Black with a bit of mango flavoring. I also have Tricuits(TM) and Laughing Cow(TM) cheese, so help yourself.

The washer is running because I got wet in the river today, helping a friend get his sailboat onto a trailer. The drive train on his outboard had seized up, so he sailed it to the boat ramp, where a mechanic removed the old drive train and installed a new one. The afternoon was pleasant enough - the temperature hovering in the mid-90s, but low enough humidity that a breeze and shade kept us cool.

You will notice that most of the floor has been removed from the bathroom. Some friends helped me tear out the old tongue-and-groove flooring, because it had some rotten spots in it. The subflooring is good, and some friends will help me put down a new floor later this week. That will involve laying down plywood, backer board, and ceramic tile. Have you ever tried to match 50 year old almond ceramic tile with what's available today? On my budget there isn't much choice but to buy off-the-shelf and hope no one notices the shade difference. I'm putting down a black border along the edges, so maybe that will help.

The paint was peeling off the ceiling, and once I started scraping, it came off in sheets. Some of the wall paint is like that, too. The local home supplies store sold me something called "Gripper" that goes on as a primer, and some paint to go over that.

I may come up with a theological question to ponder later, but I'm sapped just now. What's up with you?

T&T

Monday, July 31, 2006

Tea as a conserver of time

Glad you stopped by. Neither of us has as much time as we would like, but a casual cuppa can do wonders for the day. Oolong or Earl Grey? Good, I'm in the mood for Oolong, too. Milk or lemon? Sugar? Here you are. The only biscuits I have are store-bought chocolate chip cookies, but they're okay.

Now: tell me what's been on your mind lately. We have time - and tea.

T&T